Stress testing involves evaluating how decision alternatives perform in different conditions.

When to use

Understanding how performance of decision alternatives can vary in future can help design better management options by understanding in what conditions an alternative is "robust" and performs well, or under what circumstances changes will need to made within an "adaptive" solution.

Measures of performance and one or more decision alternatives need to be specified. Stress testing can be performed in an optimisation context (e.g. to identify robust decisions), in which case the decision alternatives are defined within a model.

How

Stress testing methods differ in how they characterise scenarios and the form of output they provide. Scenarios can be pre-determined, defined by model parameters, or created within the stress testing process. Stress testing may report failures, simply show how performance varies, or aim to compare decision alternatives.

Specific classes of approaches therefore include:

Tools

  • foreSIGHT: An R package to create hydroclimate scenarios, stress test systems and visualize system performance in scenario-neutral climate change impact assessments.
  • Also see

  • Scenario-neutral climate impact assessment: Evaluates system performance across a range of possible climates rather than a pre-determined set of scenarios
  • Resources